|
PRIVATISATION - A BLESSING OR A CURSE TO
THE BASOTHO NATION?
Some
quarters within Lesotho seem to think that the privatisation and
restructuring of former state-owned enterprises imply necessarily
surrendering our nation’s sovereignty and national pride, status and
humanity to South Africans. Nothing could be further from the truth. It
is important at this stage to explain why the need for restructuring of
the economy, which led to their privatisation, came about.
1. The Situation in the Past
a) Lesotho
Telecommunications Corporation
The
Lesotho Telecommunications Corporations was established by Act No.12 of
1979 to supply telecommunications services throughout Lesotho. Although
during the first few years LTC succeeded to improve the telephone
connections within the main towns of Lesotho, however, it was not long
before LTC showed signs of deterioration in service delivery. It soon
became obvious that LTC lacked the capacity to fulfill the conditions of
its existence as evidenced by:
· Apparent
delays in attending to faults. It was normal to wait for a telephone to
be repaired for more than a month in some cases.
· Inability
to provide new lines-thus unable to satisfy increasing demand for
service. The unmet demand for telecommunications lines stood at 22,000.
· Loss
of M3.9 million during 1996
· Loss
of M12.9 during 1997
· High
staffing levels: in early 1999 LTC employed 785 staff, implying that
there were 27 lines per employee, compared to OECD average of 188 lines
per staff member.
· Inability
to provide the necessary infrastructure needed to expand the service to
the under serviced areas of the country
· Huge
debt of approximately M56 million.
b) Lesotho Electricity Corporation
LEC had insurmountable problems, which
included:
· Inefficient
commercial operations: evidence of systematically organised monthly
reading of electricity meters resulted in sometimes customers billed six
months after the service provision.
· Inability
to meet the demand for electricity connection
· High
operational costs characterised by high staffing levels: LEC employed
805 people resulting in a ‘customer per employee’ ratio of 17
connections. Regionally, the ratio is between 60-160 connections.
· Poor
financial management: LECs billing system failed in 1997 causing major
inaccuracies in its customer database and tremendous delays in billing.
At some stage, the parastatal did not have cash to pay for its power
supplies and was in arrears on salaries to its employees.
· High
tariffs
· Inability
to service loan commitments: LEC owed the Government M13.5 million, and
a further M85 million owed for power expansion in the north and southern
regions;
c) The Banking Sector
The banking sector in Lesotho had ceased to
perform its key function of safe keeping of depositors’ money and
extending credit to worthy borrowers. During the latter part of 1990 the
two state-owned banks began to experience difficulties largely as a
result of inadequate management and extension of credit to borrowers
without regard to prudent lending policies. In the case of the Lesotho
Agricultural Development Bank, the loan portfolio of the bank was
increasingly getting contaminated. By 1997, the bank had become
insolvent meaning that its liabilities were far in excess of its assets.
The bank was not in a position to honour all the claims on it by its
creditor including the depositors. The bank was also beginning to
experience liquidity problems. The financial situation of LADB continued
to deteriorate such that by 1998, the government was injecting funds
into the bank to the tune of M2.0 million per month in order to enable
it to continue its operations.
The situation was even worse at Lesotho
Bank – the country’s largest commercial bank. The loan portfolio of the
bank had gradually deteriorated over the years again as a result of
inadequate management and because of political interventions. In 1995,
the bank was forced to recognise this situation and for the first time
in its history, the Bank reported losses amounting to some M58.3
million. The situation was made worse by the collapse of the bank’s
management information system in 1997. By 1999, the government was
injecting M20 million a month into the bank in order to keep the bank
operational and to safeguard depositor’s funds.
d) PVPS
Before Imperial Fleet Services took over
the management of government fleet, there were no systematic records of
total number of government fleet; no record of removable components that
each vehicle brought in for repairs had. Even worse, numberplates of
cars were usually removed when major repairs had to be undertaken by
sub-contracted garages in South Africa. Removal of the number plates
was made deliberately to prevent identification of vehicles belonging to
private individuals from those belonging to the Government of Lesotho.
Government vehicles did not have any
insurance cover except third party insurance. This resulted in huge
expenses for the Government as evidenced by the number of vehicle
involved in accidents that have been declared write-offs.
A control of vehicles entering and leaving
the PVPS premises was almost non-existent leading to theft of cars,
spare parts and tools. Rampant theft of car components was evidenced by
the high depletion of stock within a short period. There was no thorough
check at the entrance or exit of drivers to identify whether the driver
possesses the correct identification. The system of parking cars was
haphazard and the premises had an untidy appearance which evidenced bad
management. Even the car keys were not properly tagged to afford easy
identification of vehicles to be collected. It was common for illegal
multiple refueling of vehicles in a single day arising from theft of
petrol. Whole sets of tyres went missing from new cars and nobody
bothered to check. It became a custom for drivers of vehicles being
taken for repairs to remove the car radio since it was common knowledge
that car radios went missing.
Between April, 1998 and February, 1999 the
actual cost incurred by the old PVPS which are known to Government
amounted to M48, 331, 911.00. However, there are other hidden costs
which the Government is unable to account for which include thefts of
vehicles and their components such as batteries, abuses of vehicles,
vehicles involves in major accidents which were declared write-offs,
overcharging of maintenance of vehicles and thefts of fuel from
government vehicles by drivers and government officials.
2. Why Privatisation?
Privatisation is an evolutionary process
that calls for major changes in the way the economy is managed. First
and foremost privatisation means the transfer of Government owned
enterprises, or their parts or shares into private sector hands.
Admittedly, some people are intimidated by change itself simply because
it means change into the unfamiliar and unknown. The fundamental
questions that are being asked are whether private sector ownership of
key enterprises will deliver better service, increased employment
opportunities; faster development and lead to better allocation of
limited national resources for education, public health, judicial
services and infrastructure development.
The process of restructuring has costs and
benefits. Among costs mention may be made of retrenchments of workers in
overstaffed enterprises, happening at the time of chronic unemployment
facing the economy. The introduction of competitive practices also
painfully disrupted entrenched monopolies.
In addition to exposing the underlying
corruption that had been taking place for years, The restructuring
process has had the greatest benefit by relieving Government and the
taxpayer the heavy burden of subsidizing loss-making inefficient state
owned enterprises.
Ten years ago, the independent countries of
Southern Africa had a special niche among donors because of the
situation then prevailing in South Africa. But today foreign aid has
dried up. In its place foreign investment must be sought. Foreign
investment, however, requires a predictable welcoming environment in the
form of a private sector that is vibrant.
The situation in Lesotho is such that there
is insufficient local capital within the country to create all the jobs
that are needed. Consequently, it is incumbent upon the upon the policy
makers to create an investment climate that is attractive to foreign
investors in the form of inputs that are of paramount importance to
potential investors. Furthermore, the inputs have to be of international
standards otherwise investors will relocate elsewhere. Hence the reform
of the utilities sector which is currently on-going.
The United States of America recently
passed the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the intention being
to allow free access of goods from Sub-Saharan countries such as
Lesotho. As a result of these arrangements, it is expected that there
will be an influx of foreign investors into Lesotho to take advantage of
these open markets. When this influx occurs, it is important that
Lesotho should be able to provide utility services that are at least as
efficient and as reliable as other investment destinations, as judged by
investors. Privatisation of state-owned enterprises is the first step in
this direction.
3. The Situation at Present
Imperial Fleet Services has installed a
computerised system called Fuel-O-Mat, which links Engen Filling Station
with Imperial Fleet Services. The purpose of installing the system is to
control and prevent the illegal use of by drivers and government
officials. When filling the petrol, the system immediately indicates the
Department/Ministry to which the car belongs; the last date of refuel;
and the number of kilometers traveled.
Attempts have already made by Government
drivers to tamper with the system. Tampering causes the computerised
system to jam, resulting in inability to refuel the vehicle. When the
vehicle is taken for repairs to enable the system once again, Imperial
Fleet Services notifies the transport officer of the ministry in charge
about the tampering; the system is once again enabled and the costs
incurred are borne by the Ministry to which the vehicle belongs. The
system has resulted in huge savings on the part of Lesotho Government
account on petrol. In addition the computerised system has curbed
rampant corruption that was taking place in the form of theft of fuel
from Government vehicles.
When a government vehicle is taken in for
repairs, a record, which is signed by Imperial Fleet official and the
driver of the vehicle, is made of tools, a radio, a spare wheel, a jack,
and any other components of the vehicle that may removed. This fairly
simple system has helped to curb rampant theft of spare parts that was
taking place in the old days of PVPS.
During the period from April, 2000 to
February, 2001 when Imperial Fleet Services was operating at the old
PVPS premises, the following amounts were paid to the Government of
Lesotho:
·
M8, 518, 223.00
for Corporate Tax
·
M1, 737,
051.00 for Income Tax
·
M47, 637.00 for
Fringe Benefits Tax
·
M4, 460, 337.00
for other taxes
·
M1, 557, 936.00
for renting PVPS premises
·
M3.4 million
for 20 percent shares held by Government
·
M72 million for
the sale of Government vehicles to imperial Fleet Services
·
M10.9 million
for the purchase of other activities and operations formerly used by
PVPS.
Despite the fiscal burden that the
Government has been relieved of, the Government is complaining about the
huge costs incurred for its fleet. Records indicate that for the month
of August Ministry of Agriculture has incurred cost of over M1.3
million; Public Works and Transport M940, 000; and Health and Social
Welfare M820, 000. Costs for the whole Government fleet for the month
of August are estimated at over M8.3 million. The major handicap is the
missing records from PVPS to substantiate that fleet management by PVPS
was in fact more economic than Imperial Fleet Services. On the other
hand, local garages are already reaping benefits from outsourcing from
Imperial Motors. In March of this year, for instance, outsourcing to
local garages amounted to M14.7 million while in South Africa the figure
was M3.05 million.
Restructuring of the banking sector bore
fruits almost immediately. Under the new ownership and management
structure, the new Lesotho Bank was once again profitable and
depositor’s monies were intact. By the end of 1999, only five months
following its restructuring, the Bank reported profits and actually paid
dividends to Government, as one of its shareholders, to the tune of M5.0
million.
Already the ATM cardholders have seen
tremendous improvements in ATM machines that are always in working order
(referred to as ATM uptime). Before, there were always huge queues at
ATM machines, and amazingly this problem occurred usually around the 20th
to the 30th of every month which is the time when workers
from various sectors of the economy in Lesotho are being paid.
Complaints coming from Lesotho Bank 1999
customers point out that queues are too long. In recognition of this
problem, Lesotho Bank 1999 is in the process of phasing out savings
books to substitute them with ATM cards. Civil servants will be paid
directly through their bank accounts and the whole process will take
about 20 weeks. Because of the large number of employees in industrial
firms, the phasing out of their saving books will spill into the year
2002.
In the case of LEC, the management
consultants who took over the running of the parastatal in February this
year in preparation for its privatisation have already advertised in
newspapers for electrical connections for small businesses in Maseru,
Berea, Maputsoe, Mafeteng, Leribe and Mohale’s Hoek. This initiative
mainly addresses the huge backlog of electrification that should have
been completed long ago. Already, 2,500 new electricity connections and
3, 500 meter conversions have already been made since new management of
LEC took over in February this year.
It should be recognised that the ultimate
goal of economic reform is to achieve a more streamlined, efficient, and
productive economy. Unlike negative sentiments that have been expressed
about the privatisation process in Lesotho, the private sector
environment is such that managers make more prudent and economically
efficient decisions than their civil service counterparts. Led by the
need to survive, with no opportunity of Government rescuing their
enterprises from financial distress, the private sector invests in
project that will maximise their own success, thus injecting positive
influence into the economy.
Makalo Ntsasa
Senior Information
Officer
Privatisation Unit
|